Railcar Covers and Lids: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Covered hopper cars, which are equipped with a roof, have historically been used for cargo like grain, sugar, and fertilizer that must be protected from exposure to the weather. Coal, which can be exposed with minimal effect to the product, has been transported in open hopper cars. In an effort to prevent [[Health impacts: particles and coal dust|dangerous fugitive coal dust]] emissions, some railroads and coal shippers have begun putting covers on the coal as well. However, because of cheaper and similarly effective solutions on the market, covering the coal remains a rare choice for dust control. | Covered hopper cars, which are equipped with a roof, have historically been used for cargo like grain, sugar, and fertilizer that must be protected from exposure to the weather. Coal, which can be exposed with minimal effect to the product, has been transported in open hopper cars. In an effort to prevent [[Health impacts: particles and coal dust|dangerous fugitive coal dust]] emissions, some railroads and coal shippers have begun putting covers on the coal as well. However, because of cheaper and similarly effective solutions on the market, covering the coal remains a rare choice for dust control. | ||
A 2004 experiment by Ferreira & Vaz found that the use of covers reduces the amount of dust released to be less than 20% of the quantity eroded from the uncovered wagon. In other words, when compared to the no-cover situation, the semi-cover reduced the dust amount released more than 80% for the full-load situation.<ref>Ferreira et al., [[:File:1-s2.0-S0167610503000771-main.pdf|Wind Tunnel Study of Coal Dust Release from Train Wagons]], ''Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,'' 92, 7-8, 565–577, 2004.</ref> | A 2004 experiment by Ferreira & Vaz found that the use of covers reduces the amount of dust released to be less than 20% of the quantity eroded from the uncovered wagon. In other words, when compared to the no-cover situation, the semi-cover reduced the dust amount released more than 80% for the full-load situation.<ref>Ferreira et al., [[:File:1-s2.0-S0167610503000771-main.pdf|Wind Tunnel Study of Coal Dust Release from Train Wagons]], ''Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,'' 92, 7-8, 565–577, 2004.</ref> | ||
Installing lids involves substantial retrofitting expenses and operational hurdles, as loading terminals and mines would need new infrastructure, and lids complicate fast unloading. Many operators instead favor [[Chemical Dust Suppression: Sprinklers and Surfactants|chemical dust suppressants]], which have been shown to achieve a high reduction in dust at lower cost. | Installing lids involves substantial retrofitting expenses and operational hurdles, as loading terminals and mines would need new infrastructure, and lids complicate fast unloading. Many operators instead favor [[Chemical Dust Suppression: Sprinklers and Surfactants|chemical dust suppressants]], which have been shown to achieve a high reduction in dust at lower cost. | ||
Revision as of 11:43, 17 June 2025
One solution to fugitive coal dust emissions is to cover the train cars with a physical lid. As uncovered coal trains travel long distances, wind and vibration can release fine particulate matter into the air. A secure lid system could significantly reduce these emissions by containing the dust at its source.
Covered hopper cars, which are equipped with a roof, have historically been used for cargo like grain, sugar, and fertilizer that must be protected from exposure to the weather. Coal, which can be exposed with minimal effect to the product, has been transported in open hopper cars. In an effort to prevent dangerous fugitive coal dust emissions, some railroads and coal shippers have begun putting covers on the coal as well. However, because of cheaper and similarly effective solutions on the market, covering the coal remains a rare choice for dust control.
A 2004 experiment by Ferreira & Vaz found that the use of covers reduces the amount of dust released to be less than 20% of the quantity eroded from the uncovered wagon. In other words, when compared to the no-cover situation, the semi-cover reduced the dust amount released more than 80% for the full-load situation.[1]
Installing lids involves substantial retrofitting expenses and operational hurdles, as loading terminals and mines would need new infrastructure, and lids complicate fast unloading. Many operators instead favor chemical dust suppressants, which have been shown to achieve a high reduction in dust at lower cost.
Documents
- Ferreira et al., Full-Scale Measurements for Evaluation of Coal Dust Release from Train Wagons with Two Different Shelter Covers, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 91, 10, 1271–83, 2003
- Ferreira et al., Wind Tunnel Study of Coal Dust Release from Train Wagons, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 92 (7-8): 565–77, 2004
References
- ↑ Ferreira et al., Wind Tunnel Study of Coal Dust Release from Train Wagons, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 92, 7-8, 565–577, 2004.