Anti-Coal Dust Activism Outside of Hampton Roads: Difference between revisions
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== East Coast == | == East Coast == | ||
=== | === Baltimore, Maryland === | ||
Baltimore, Maryland has the second largest national coal exports, with over 7 million tons exported annually (only second to Norfolk, Virginia's 9 million). Like in Hampton Roads, people living near the coal terminals in Baltimore's Curtis Bay have higher rates of asthma compared to other areas. An explosion in 2021 at the facility brought increased attention to the issue. In July 2025, a John Hopkins study linked high instances of dust pollution to times when the wind is blowing across the terminal, or when bulldozers are active on the site. About a week later, the state of Maryland issued the terminal, which is owned by CSX, a new operating permit that required the operators to build a wind fence around the terminal to mitigate the coal dust. | |||
[ | ''Read more about the activism in Baltimore at: [[Baltimore, MD]]'' | ||
=== Roda, Virginia === | === Roda, Virginia === | ||
| Line 13: | Line 11: | ||
== West Coast == | == West Coast == | ||
=== | === Oakland, California === | ||
Read more about anti-coal activism in Oakland at: [[Oakland, CA]] | In the early 2010s, developers unveiled plans to redevelop the Oakland Army Base as the Oakland Bulk & Oversized Terminal (OBOT). Though the terminal initially promised to only transport low dust cargo, it emerged that the terminal had quietly agreed to ship millions of tons of coal per year. At first, the City of Oakland tried to prevent the coal by passing an ordinance and resolution banning coal handling at the proposed terminal. However, OBOT sued and won in federal district court. Later, the City tried to terminate OBOT's lease, and OBOT again sued and won, this time in Alameda County Superior Court. Despite these blows to the movement, activists have not given up and continue to be vocal in their opposition to the coal. | ||
''Read more about No Coal in Oakland and anti-coal activism in Oakland at: [[Oakland, CA]]'' | |||
=== | === Richmond, California === | ||
https://nocoalinoakland.info/richmond-coal-exports-to-end-by-2026-ej-advocates-celebrate-agreement/ | https://nocoalinoakland.info/richmond-coal-exports-to-end-by-2026-ej-advocates-celebrate-agreement/ | ||
Revision as of 02:22, 31 July 2025
East Coast
Baltimore, Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland has the second largest national coal exports, with over 7 million tons exported annually (only second to Norfolk, Virginia's 9 million). Like in Hampton Roads, people living near the coal terminals in Baltimore's Curtis Bay have higher rates of asthma compared to other areas. An explosion in 2021 at the facility brought increased attention to the issue. In July 2025, a John Hopkins study linked high instances of dust pollution to times when the wind is blowing across the terminal, or when bulldozers are active on the site. About a week later, the state of Maryland issued the terminal, which is owned by CSX, a new operating permit that required the operators to build a wind fence around the terminal to mitigate the coal dust.
Read more about the activism in Baltimore at: Baltimore, MD
Roda, Virginia
[coming soon]
West Coast
Oakland, California
In the early 2010s, developers unveiled plans to redevelop the Oakland Army Base as the Oakland Bulk & Oversized Terminal (OBOT). Though the terminal initially promised to only transport low dust cargo, it emerged that the terminal had quietly agreed to ship millions of tons of coal per year. At first, the City of Oakland tried to prevent the coal by passing an ordinance and resolution banning coal handling at the proposed terminal. However, OBOT sued and won in federal district court. Later, the City tried to terminate OBOT's lease, and OBOT again sued and won, this time in Alameda County Superior Court. Despite these blows to the movement, activists have not given up and continue to be vocal in their opposition to the coal.
Read more about No Coal in Oakland and anti-coal activism in Oakland at: Oakland, CA
Richmond, California
https://nocoalinoakland.info/richmond-coal-exports-to-end-by-2026-ej-advocates-celebrate-agreement/
Documents
City of Richmond, CA. ORDINANCE NO. 05-20 N.S. 2020.
Midwest
Control of Emissions from Handling and Storing Bulk Materials. City of Chicago. January 25, 2019.
Oak Creek
[see 'Wind Fence' doc]
Documents